But with Apple saying that they do not encourage using AirTags on pets, they bear no responsibility for anything that may happen as a result. I live in California, where people seem to sue over everything, so I can totally picture these scenarios. Or perhaps your dog or cat somehow got the AirTag loop attachment off (maybe a cheap accessory) and got out - there would be no way to track them with an AirTag since it actually isn't on them, and one realizes this too late. In this case, someone may get mad that they couldn't find their dog with the AirTag before it got hit and may try to blame and sue Apple by claiming that the AirTag did not work. As sad as it is, many pets may get hit by a passing car that did not even see the pet crossing the street.
By saying that an AirTag should not be used for this scenario specifically, Apple is no longer liable for anything that may happen while you use an AirTag to track pets.įor example, if you put an AirTag on your dog and they accidentally escape from your yard, anything can happen from that point on.
It may be pretty obvious, but I believe that Apple discourages using AirTags on pets because they do not want to be held liable if anything unfortunate happens. Apple probably doesn't want to be held liable in case anything happens to Fido
0 kommentar(er)
